Comment on the news

Is guilt by association fair?   Many blogs and websites, including APRPEH have made an argument that <?xml:namespace prefix = st2 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /> <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas:contacts" /> Barry Obama 's true feelings towards Jews and Israel can be measured by his associations.   Undeniable facts about Obama, many of them posed as questions left unanswered or not answered in a credible or believeable fashion have formed the core of the No-Bama effort.   These questions remain legitimate campaign issues and concerns.   Obama DID indeed maintain a 20+ year relationship as a member of TUCC in the Jeremiah Wright flock, listening to what is undeniably anti-US and antiJew rhetoric only distancing himself when his crusade for the Presidency was jeopardized.  

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />  

Who are Obama's friends and associates for which he should be measured? Let's take a closer look using easy to find world wide web references.

 

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-na-obamamideast10apr10,1,2127459,full.story .   Obama's special friend, Rashid Khalidi , former spokesman for the scumbag Yasir Arafat who held fundraisers for Obama, was honored with a speech by State Sen. Barack Obama in a 2003 going away party. Khalidi, according to the LA Times story is described as "internationally known scholar, critic of Israel and advocate for Palestinian rights.  

 

Then there is Ali Abunimah , described in the same LA Times article as " a Palestinian rights activist in Chicago who helps run Electronic Intifada, and quoted as saying:

 

Abunimah quoted Obama as saying that he was sorry he wasn't talking more about the Palestinian cause, but that his primary campaign had constrained what he could say.

 

Now, lets add to the mix the Obama foreign policy advisors who have come and gone.   I am not even sure I remember them all.   Please feel free to add to the list in the comments:

 

Samantha Powers - http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWM0YjI0ZWQ4NmI1MzQ2YTM1NWMxZDE4MDIzMzk4OTM =

 

Cirincione - http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=63031

 

Robert Malley - http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2008/02/obamas-israel-hating-advisor-robert.html

 

http://aprpeh-feed.blogspot.com/2008/01/obama-oh-my.html  

http://aprpeh-feed.blogspot.com/2008/02/obama-counter-offensive-malley-defense.html

 

Merrill Tony McPeak - http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3523709,00.html

 

 

 

Zbigniew Bzrezinski - http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/01/barack_obama_and_israel.html

 

Ed Lasko at American Thinker adds:

The appointment of Brzezenski elicited much dismay among supporters of Israel since Brzezinski is well known for his aggressive dislike of Israel . . He has been an ardent foe of Israel for over three decades and newspaper files are littered with his screeds against Israel . Brzezinski has publicly defended the Walt-Mearsheimer thesis that the relationship between America and Israel is based not on shared values and common threats but is the product of Jewish pressure. Brzezinski also signed a letter demanding dialogue with Hamas-a group whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel and is filled with threats to Jews around the world.

 

 

Financial support from not very friendly to Israel , George Soros can be added to the equation as well even though Obama has attempted to distance himself from the billionaire contributer. If Obama really wants to distance himself from the tens of thousands of dollars contributed through Soros connections has he offered to return any recent donations and asked Soros and his Moveon.org friends to stop supporting his campaign?

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/04/soros_obama_and_the_millionair.html

http://www.nysun.com/national/obama-rebuffs-soros/50846/

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/george_soros_and_the_obamas_ve.html

 

 

And while it is not necessarily Jewish related, how can we forget Syrian born friend Tony Rezko , former donor and fundraiser for Obama, convicted recently on corruption related charges.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Rezko

 

Obama's relationship with terrorist and political indoctrination specialist William Ayers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Ayers and Bernadine Dorhn   along with former "Weatherman" and wife Bernadine Dorhn http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernardine_Dohrn is well documented and factual.  

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=57231  

 

additional references

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/04/020358.php

 

http://www.aprpeh-feed.blogspot.com/search?q=obama

 

So what is the point of going through this exercise, re-hashing the well published reports you might ask?   The Obama fans and possibly Obama campaign are behind an effort to obfuscate.   See Can Obama fight Web-driven lies?

http://news.postbulletin.com/newsmanager/templates/localnews_story.asp?z=12&a=348816

 

and Snap Judgment: Have you read the latest Obama e-mail? Unbelievable!

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1213794281364

 

tr.v. ob·fus·cat· ed , ob·fus·cat·ing, ob·fus·cates

1. To make so confused or opaque as to be difficult to perceive or understand: "A great effort was made . . . to obscure or obfuscate the truth" Robert Conquest .

2. To render indistinct or dim; darken: The fog obfuscated the shore.

            (The Free Dictionary)

 

It is true that a considerable amount of email and internet garbage is floating around alleging all sorts of BS about Obama.   It is also true that email based urban myth is one of the downsides of the electronic world.   Our email boxes are flooded with Nigerian scam email, phishing, and urban myths begging the reader to perpetuate the falsity.  

 

In fact, call it reverse guilt by association.   It is with this understanding that the agenda of the Obama camp to label every blog post, every email, every warning about Obama as driven by crazies with a hate filled, anti-Muslim or racist agenda is underway.   Some, they may say are just plain crazy.   But all of them, all criticism is illegitimate (according to this strategy) because it is someone's opinion, not the truth - just another one of those "myths".  

 

This policy must be confronted strongly and clearly.   The list above is composed of undeniable fact. The effort to re-cast the past of Obama as something else, something different, something sweet and innocent is a fraud and should be called a fraud.  

 

Obama cannot reasonably claim that he had no knowledge of the offensive, disgusting, and criminal aspects of his friends in the past as he cannot claim that he has no knowledge of our doesn't agree with the antiJew and anti-Israel opinions of his foreign policy team.   If he really had no knowledge, he is the most ignorant man who has ever run for the Presidency.  

 

Of course, some Obama staffer can just say all of this is campaign rhetoric and to take it as a grain of salt. Afterall, it IS the internet. Or readers and concerned, thoughtful Americans can expose the truth, continue writing to the newspapers, calling talk radio, writing blogs, responding to blogs and talking to their friends who may be on the fence. Freedom is not free and free speech is under assault by the Obama people, a telling foretaste of an Obama administration.