+Vote!
TruthSeeker24's anti-N.W.O. corner (Free subscription) | 8 hours ago
From http://www.infowars.com/?p=4056 The FBI Admits It Has No Case Against Ivins The FBI has admitted that it has no case against Ivins. As summarized in an article today in the Washington Post: The FBI has had a difficult time making its case to a skeptical public and scientific community. A hair sample snagged from a Princeton, N.J., mailbox linked to the attacks turned out not to match...
+Vote!
Rock The Truth (Free subscription) | 8 hours ago
Damn the MSM. Damn them! "The FBI has admitted that it has no case against Ivins. As summarized in an article today in the Washington Post : The FBI has had a difficult time making its case to a skeptical public and scientific community . A hair sample snagged from a Princeton, N.J., mailbox linked to the attacks turned out not to match that of Ivins. Some Congressional critics have questioned...
+Vote!
Innisfree (Free subscription) | 08/19/2008
This story still sounds ridiculous. FBI officials admitted Monday that destroying the initial Ivins sample was a mistake, but said it didn't really hinder the investigation because the technique used to trace the source of the anthrax to Ivins had not been developed yet. Luckily, a copy of that first sample was sent to an outside professor, who years later used it to help further link...
+Vote!
Philadelphia Inquirer (Free subscription) | 08/19/2008
FBI investigators trying to find the perpetrator of the 2001 anthrax attacks began focusing on Bruce Ivins in 2004 after he submitted an anthrax sample under subpoena that differed from earlier samples he had provided, FBI officials said yesterday.
+Vote!
LA Times (Free subscription) | 08/19/2008
One revelation is that, contrary to what some officials had claimed, the mailed anthrax had not been 'weaponized.' Scientists behind the case against Bruce E. Ivins, who federal officials allege was solely responsible for the deadly anthrax mailings of 2001, publicly described their work for the first time Monday and said the spores had originated from a flask linked by investigators to the...
+Vote!
Los Angeles Times (Free subscription) | 08/19/2008
One revelation is that, contrary to what some officials had claimed, the mailed anthrax had not been 'weaponized.' Scientists behind the case against Bruce E. Ivins, who federal officials allege was solely responsible for the deadly anthrax mailings of 2001, publicly described their work for the first time Monday and said the spores had originated from a flask linked by investigators to the...
+Vote!
Democratic Underground (Free subscription) | 08/19/2008
Source: [b]frederick news post[/b] WASHINGTON Contrary to initial reports, Bruce Ivins did give investigators a sample of the anthrax the FBI has identified as the same type used in the attacks, but they destroyed it because it didn't meet their standards for evidence. FBI scientists release...
+Vote!
www.OSIR.org.in (Free subscription) | 08/19/2008
WASHINGTON — Scientists behind the case against Bruce E. Ivins, who federal officials allege was solely responsible for the deadly anthrax mailings of 2001, publicly described their work for the first time Monday and said the spores had originated Source: www.latimes.com As chemists gather, let s refocus efforts to gain diversity in [...]
+Vote!
Fore Left! (Free subscription) | 08/19/2008
The FBI held a technical session at its HQ this afternoon to discuss the anthrax whodunit in more scientific detail. The media was invited, sans cameras, for what that was worth. The news clarified last Friday's New York Times report that said, seemingly contrary to previous reports and the affidavits themselves, that Ivins's initial sample actually did match the evidence anthrax. Not quite....
+Vote!
The American Conservative (Free subscription) | 08/18/2008
... involve drug enforcement, should be executing drug raids. On the same day of the Calvo raid, Bruce Ivins, a government microbiologist, was pronounced dead of an apparent suicide. The FBI says he is likely responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks. The newspapers proceed to run a series of stories suggesting he was a paranoid, drug-addled homicidal freak. But this was just weeks after another...
+Vote!
OUTLOUD (Free subscription) | 08/16/2008
The FBI’s prime suspect in the 2001 anthrax terror attacks on the US Senate, Bruce Ivins was allegedly motivated by a staunch pro-life agenda. Ivins committed suicide on July 29, before the Justice Department pressed charges. Ivin’s wife was the president of an anti-abortion group, and Ivins himself supported an anti-gay group who partipated in bashing Democratic [...]
+Vote!
Rants From The Rookery (Free subscription) | 08/16/2008
How she said," The next time I tell you someone from Texas should not be president of the United States, please, pay attention."? Via Steve Bates of The Yellow Doggerel Democrat , here is our next warning about a man running for President, written by Amy Silverman. We are being warned. Is anyone listening? Update: Sinfonian of Blast Off absolutely shreds an article expounding on why real men vote for...
+Vote!
News: Moldova.org: Politics (Free subscription) | 08/15/2008
U.S. agents in the 2001 anthrax mailings missed or ignored clues pointing to the man they eventually said was the suspect, a review of records indicates.Records show FBI agents overlooked a series of clues early in the investigation that indicated Army scientist Bruce Ivins was the source of the mailings while investigators focused on another Army researcher, the Los Angeles Times reported.The...
+Vote!
LA Times (Free subscription) | 08/15/2008
Records show that the FBI missed signs pointing to Ivins in the deadly mailings: He used a restricted lab at key times and failed to provide a sample or report a supposed spill. The investigation instead remained locked on a former Army researcher. As federal authorities pursued the wrong suspect in the deadly anthrax mailings of 2001, they ignored or overlooked a series of early clues that...
